Vietnamese Journal of Neurology

Article detail

Article detail description

Home
Tóm tắt - Abstract Issue: Số 34 - 2022 PHIÊN SA SÚT TRÍ TUỆ - HỘI NGHỊ KHOA HỌC TOÀN QUỐC 2022

Feasibility, Reliability, and Validity of the Vietnamese Version of the Clinical Dementia Rating

Published: July 23, 2026
Lượt đọc: 19

Abstract

Introduction: In Vietnam, Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other dementias have become increasingly important public health concerns among older adults. Developing a diagnostic instrument with high reliability and validity is therefore essential. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) is a global clinical assessment scale widely used for diagnosing dementia and classifying its severity, and it has been extensively applied in epidemiological studies worldwide. Objective: To develop the Vietnamese version of the Clinical Dementia Rating (V-CDR) and evaluate its feasibility, reliability, and validity for diagnosing and classifying cognitive function in older adults. Methods: A total of 153 older outpatients at Cho Ray Hospital were screened for cognitive impairment using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Participants with MMSE scores ≤26 were enrolled in the study and subsequently assessed using the Vietnamese version of the CDR (V-CDR) and standard clinical diagnostic criteria for dementia. Reliability was evaluated by internal consistency (Cronbach’s α), intrarater reliability, and interrater reliability (weighted κ). Concurrent validity and discriminative validity of the V-CDR were also assessed. Results: The V-CDR demonstrated excellent internal consistency for both raters (Cronbach’s α = 0.90 and 0.96) and excellent intrarater and interrater reliability (weighted κ = 0.84 [95% CI: 0.74–0.94] and 0.82 [95% CI: 0.72–0.93], respectively). The sensitivity and specificity for detecting dementia were 93.6% and 100%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 100% and 96.4%, respectively. Agreement between the V-CDR and the clinical diagnosis was excellent (weighted κ = 0.94; 95% CI: 0.88–0.99). The V-CDR significantly outperformed the MMSE in discriminating mild cognitive impairment from normal cognitive function (AUC = 0.957, 95% CI: 0.893–1.000 vs. AUC = 0.594, 95% CI: 0.441–0.746). Conclusions: The Vietnamese version of the Clinical Dementia Rating is a feasible, reliable, and valid instrument. It should be incorporated into routine clinical practice for diagnosing dementia and classifying its severity among older adults.

Keywords
Lumbar spondylosis Low back pain Lumbar spine Degenerative spine disease Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs Dexketoprofen

Authors

Trần Công Thắng Đại học Y Dược TP. Hồ Chí Minh
Feasibility, Reliability, and Validity of the Vietnamese Version of the Clinical Dementia Rating

Files

Trích dẫn

APA

Định dạng

Article Views19
Document Views13
Downloads8
Section Tóm tắt - Abstract
Category PHIÊN SA SÚT TRÍ TUỆ - HỘI NGHỊ KHOA HỌC TOÀN QUỐC 2022
Pages 78-79
Copyright Holder 2022 Vietnamese Journal of Neurology